Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zachary (Z-FLO) Esters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 03:06, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zachary (Z-FLO) Esters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure what to make of this, but considering the scarcity of secondary sources on the Web, doubtful notability can be established. Laval (talk) 22:35, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 00:04, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

•Every piece of information in this article is referenced. Can you be more specific? Is there a certain piece of information that you cannot validate that causes your doubt of notability? Also, on another note, this guy is all over Google. You may have to switch your Google query/search options to "United States of America" if you live in another country to see it. Anonywriter13 (talk) 21:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom - Nothing notable, everything is a primary source directly attributable to subject/his PR team, or from non-reliable websites such as IMDB. Most hits are just because he was listed in the credits of a production. Caffeyw (talk) 00:38, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:40, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I tried searching a library database of newspaper and magazine articles, but did not find anything that would help to establish WP:GNG notability. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:00, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.